top of page

VALID CONCERNS ON FEMINISM PSYCHOSIS IN THE CHURCH & WEAK BETA MALES IN THE PEWS & THE PULPIT

11 minutes ago
5 min read

The church body is a reflection of the world—both good and bad—from the pew as well as the pulpit.  I would define my role in life, and it has been for as long as I have been alive, taught to me by an amazing set of parents, and that role is AGGRESSIVE INTOLERANCE.  However, both Jesus and Paul tell us that we are supposed to be separate from the world, yet Satan owns the world and uses it to gain access and establish a foothold into the church.  I have been watching the debate on “women pastors” over this last year and find it fascinating.  So, the question I ask myself is, should women be pastors as defined in the Scripture?  Is it allowable for women to be deacons, elders, or board members?  I analyzed this historically and have observed the shift over time, and I have come to my own personal conclusions through prayer and observation.  My number one concern throughout is the rise of feminism in the church rather than holiness—personal and emotional agenda over God’s will, all very fascinating to me as Jesus told us that no one can serve two masters—well, mine is God and my wife is a close second, and vice versa with her.

         Seemingly, mainly because of church attendance women hold sway in most congregations.  This has developed over the decades.  Women control the marketplace, purchases, money, etc., as this concept has eroded the role of men throughout.  I have been in relationships where I was the invisible paycheck, the caricature for disrespect, a hard spot for a man to be placed in by an over-bearing, caustic, and disrespectful woman who I thought was strong and God-fearing…QUITE the opposite as when I expressed the calling from God for full time ministry I was told that she refused to go and took the children.  In retrospect, it was actually a blessing, and yes sometimes blessings come with pain.

         We now see a strong influx of young women whose mothers came out of the Equal Rights Movement, screaming for abortion, burning bra’s, etc., who reared the next generation of women and yet remained in the church either out of routine or ritual.  Yes, this happened in the church as well as society.  These beautiful emotional creatures thumb their noses at orthodoxy and are inclined to respond to slogans thinking that so-called church has outlived its original purpose.  I watched a female person behind a pulpit avow that if Jesus were alive today He would be a doula for abortion and rewrite the Beatitudes to say “blessed are the women who abort their babies”—and people sat there and listened to this evil rant—again, people who don’t read their Scripture choose to be stupid and be spiritually led by a retard.

         Historically, in the Jewish community, women were indeed allowed in the inner courtyard of the temple, never into what were considered the sacred rooms or the holy of holies, but that was only for the priests—again, men only.  This changed in the latter centuries as Jewish scholars pushed women further from the temple (not today of course), yet depending on what brand of Jew you have, there are still differences.  I add the historic precedence as today’s church, especially in more formal settings, follows a strong tradition of the original temple construct and orderly service.

         Now, I grew up surrounded by women in church, Sunday School teachers, my mother, in music, etc., and that caring aspect was ancient and solidly good.  There was a drive there to protect vulnerable children, hold families together, and they worked doggedly to sustain the church family as well as their own.  This changed as divorce rates increased correlated with the rise of feminism.  The statistics are fascinating. 

         Based off of my analysis, on a positive note, we are seeing a rise in men’s church involvement, perhaps because people are finally seeing the feminism experiment as failing, much like Herr “Josef Mengele’s” Fauci COVID corruption.  However, I would contend that  feminism has met no resistance in the church and certainly NOT from a cowardly pulpit.  The church is obligated to be open, kind, showing Christian love, charity, and working with people for spiritual growth and personal development…an easy target for the feminism cult, just like any other psychopathy that invades the church like black mold.

         This “cult” forces conformity through the guise of Christian compassion.  Somehow, obedience feels like virtue, and the feminist in the pew espousing this feminist orthodoxy feels that she is the great protector.  Nietzsche uncovered a darker truth in that what this evil is lurks beneath absolute Christianity and feminine purpose to God in honest compassion.  He noted that envy (a very non-Christian characteristic), often presents itself as morality.  An inherent female weakness presents itself as morality.  Somehow, weakness becomes goodness and strength, and this becomes a danger to any church or moral, good-will organization.

         In many cases that I have witnessed, these feminists become like black widow spiders or tarantulas as they present themselves as lifters of the weak while simultaneously working to attrit the perceived evil patriarchy.  In the church structure, the weak we are charged to care for become ammunition for such feminists.  Once the church empowers such action, it is difficult if not impossible to shut down.  Essentially, weak men follow, not God’s purpose, but weak males adapt for survivability to conditions and whatever the mating market affords or rewards.  Once the moral consensus of women in the church has been reached, weak men adopt these sanctioned positions. 

         Weak men will espouse any and every social justice issue, yes, even Biblically to acquiesce for peace or some shard of respect.  A subordinate male in the church will force himself to mimic female behavior…again, let me remind you that God made man very differently than He made woman…and this is done, and I’m not kidding on this one, but, food, sex, and respect to his face and behind his back—essentially what a man should normally expect from the Proverbs 31 wife.

         Joost Meerloo wrote: “Such systems cultivate dependency on purpose (ideally it would be God’s construct of purpose), because the dependent transfers the loyalty owned to family (what I would say is the Truth in Gospel), onto a mass movement (of control).  Somehow, once very Godly men denounced God’s purpose and spiritual courage for compliance to make peace (happy wife, happy life) just adding to the strength of women taking over the church.

         I tell you clergy, if you’re a coward from the pulpit, God will hold you doubly responsible so be prepared.  God is NOT mocked and there won’t be a Massachusetts jury to save you.  Don’t kill God’s church, NOT yours, with lies and excuses just for money, control and power.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Donate with PayPal
bottom of page